Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Too Soon to Tell

I received comments on my first post which was titled "Not a Good Fit for Huerfano".  They add enough as to make it worth reposting with the additions in italics:


Why shale oil, also known as light tight oil or LTO, and shale gas also known as natural gas, of which coal bed methane is a type found nearer the surface, are not a good fit for Huerfano County:
  First is water scarcity. Water use for fracking is very high. Water is highly mobile and if you dislike the city telling you not to water your grass, trees and shrubs, and you think that using water from one place will not effect water availability at another, you are sadly mistaken. Just ask the folks in the San Luis Valley. And if you think a future of difficulty getting your animals to water, let alone ensuring your own clean water at home will remain unaffected, just remember that many of your fellow citizens sounded the alarm. Ask any neighbors that have tried to sell their home or ranch when there is no potable water on the property how quickly they sold their land. Petroleum tank and waste processing pads and access roads and waste water collection ponds will cover the county and strip the grassland cover. Less rain will fall due to decreased water evaporation from grass cover, and rain will run off faster with less seeping into the ground and aquifers. Everything in life is eventually paid for and while I fully understand the allure of relatively easy money, especially compared to how hard it is to earn money at ranching these days, we must ask ourselves, what is this water really worth once it is polluted and much remains forever out of reach thousands of feet below us? When ethanol was first introduced into our gasoline, almost everyone hailed its arrival. Farmers liked the increase demand for corn, environmentalists liked the idea of decreased pollution. But then we began to learn that the diesel fuel used in growing and harvesting the corn virtually offset the environmental benefits. We learned that decreased corn available to our neighbors to the south was causing hunger issues in Mexico. When such stories remain so vivid, is it not wise to wait awhile until we know more about the dangers? The future of water in the West IS the future of the West.
  Second is the health of humans and livestock. Polluted water and polluted air from fracking affects us all, as well as the health of all our animals and wildlife. It is a reasonable objection to assert that we are not yet knowledgeable about all the possible health risks. But this much we can say. There is growing evidence that health concerns may be warranted. It is all too easy, at first, to deny initial concerns about cigarettes, Agent Orange and countless pharmaceuticals causing side effects. But equally frequently those initial denials (often strenuously posited by multinational corporations) turn out to be wrong. Cigarettes were once advertised as being healthy! Again, is it not wise to wait and gather more information? The carbon based fuels beneath us, if there are any, are not going anywhere.
  Third, is the threat to our strongest asset, our beautiful countryside. Tanks, pads and burn-off stacks everywhere, along with heavy truck traffic, will drive away people who come here because of its beauty. Forget the tourists for a moment. What about US? Do we want hundreds of semis barreling down our streets? Do our kids? Everyone seems to agree that eventually we simply must convert to renewable sources of energy. Just as many people claim the need for natural gas as a “cross-over” fuel, so many others, equally well-informed experts, are convinced that if Americans stood up and demanded a more speedy transition to renewables, America would in fact surprise us all, and through its entrepreneurial ingenuity, could lead the world into this new and brighter future. Again, isn’t the wise path to wait, gather more of the information that is constantly and rapidly becoming available?
  The deck is stacked in favor of the oil and gas industry and the regulators. How do we fight back? We must not accept the power of corporations and regulators to make these decisions for us. Many residents have collected lease sign-up checks, but now see that to go further may well destroy our way of life in exchange for brown skies, traffic hazards, and depleted water. This can be stopped. As a county, we simply have to say "No, not here. At least not yet, not until we know more. Our county commissioners are on notice...we will remember who sold us out too soon and for too little and without enough information." All over the United States communities are standing up for their rights. Let's do it in Huerfano County. More could be added here, such as the effect of 25,000 acre units which consolidate mineral leases, where your lease can be extended indefinitely as long as there is exploratory drilling in the unit. And how drilling units will spread the royalties evenly so that no one lease gets all the benefit of what is directly underneath. In short, before leasing or renewing, read that fine print, or better yet think about it, just as we need to think about all of the other factors before committing to something we all will wind up regretting.

Monday, August 26, 2013

Very Brave Couple Drives Coast to Coast


Liz Nelson visited Huerfano County in July 2013.  She wrote a story about her efforts:

On a nationwide tour, the" frackmobile" left New Jersey on July 3rd and arrived here in La Veta on July 9th. The frackmobile is a mobile billboard highlighting the dangers of fracking to our resources and environmental health. It is the creation of New Jersey resident Liz Nelson, who became part of regional citizens fight to keep fracking out of the Delaware River Basin and keep toxic radioactive drill cuttings and frack waste from being stored treated or disposed in her state. “The anti-frackmobile was born when I realized that, if I placed my canoe on the roof rack of my hybrid Toyota Highlander, it would make a great billboard for the cause.” We have traveled all over my own region and to Washington DC. We lobby in state capitols, attend hearings about water withdrawals, pipelines and compressor stations, fracking regulations, and especially frack waste disposal. Recently our efforts have been joined by former frack waste haulers who have testified to the abysmal lack of worker protection and unregulated illegal handling of waste. The writing on the canoe and car is very effective, instantly drawing attention to the subject and engaging people in conversation. It also raises the spirits of citizens working hard in the trenches trying to avoid the terrible destruction of communities and permanent pollution, which fracking has brought. The Delaware River, which is the longest un-dammed river east of the Mississippi, is drinking water for more that 15 million people in the region, and is designated an "exceptional value river " because of its wild and scenic beauty. It also provides enormous recreational benefit to the region from fishing, boating and camping, which generates revenues and brings wealth to riverside-destination towns. When the Delaware River Basin Commission, which is charged with protecting the waters of the Delaware, was asked to draft regulations for drilling and fracking for methane, more than 60,000 local petitioners decided it was unacceptable and a moratorium is still in place. And just this week two big gas corporations have abandoned drilling leases on 80,000 acres of land in the pristine Upper Delaware, which is a huge victory. New Jerseyans have become aware of the toxic levels of contamination of air and water, loss of property value, and impacts on public and animal health , which have occurred in the fracking frenzy in Pennsylvania, just a couple of hours away, and we are not going to let that happen to us. Water is life. We cannot live without it. We are finding this is true in the densely populated Northeast. We do not have water to waste on fracking . In Pennsylvania the loss of some of the most pristine rivers and streams of the country to fracking is an atrocity. We are finding that in the Southwest water is already scarce and should be treated with the utmost respect. One of Liz's first adventures in La Veta was to hike to Lily Lake near Ellingwood Peak, which is the headwaters of the Huerfano River. Liz, Jim, and faithful frack-puppy pose with the colorful frackmobile.

Sunday, August 25, 2013

An Appeal to the Stakeholders in Huerfano County's Natural Wonders

I wrote this as a response to the Summer Visitors Guide published by a local newspaper:

 We discover anew the wonders of this area in the just-released colorful Signature Visitor's Guide. But we have a huge task to preserve all this natural beauty and opportunity for adventure. From Greenhorn Mountain to the Spanish Peaks, industrial oil and gas has a more sinister view of western Huerfano County. Greedy landmen have already solicited the U.S. Forest Service to lease the San Isabel National Forest at the base of the Spanish Peaks and around Cuchara for industrial oil development. What is more, 100,000s of acres have been leased in the awesome Yellowstone Road area and north to Gardner. In a conversation with a former EPA official last week, I learned that 3000 bore holes could be horizontally drilled beneath leased lands in Huerfano County. Each of these requires truck traffic in the thousands of trips to bring in water, silica substances, and fracking chemicals, and take away waste water to remote disposal facilities (if we are lucky).

The county needs help from the population segments represented  in the Signature special edition. If you are a hiker, hunter, fisherman, photographer, pilot, artist, quilter, musician, writer—the list goes on, you need to get involved in your special way, through your organizations or creative works, to protect the land from which you receive your recreation and inspiration. It is really very simple. Two photographs could tell the entire story. One of the area as it appears now and the other of a trashed industrial gas/oil field, barren well pads, and dusty, traffic-filled access roads. I can't think of a greater peril than the one we face in western Huerfano County. We need to protect our air, our water, our natural wonders, and our liberties by using our various gifts and talents to alert all our visitors and residents to what is at risk. Remember, with 3000 wells and tens of thousands truck trips, as well as high-pressure drilling pipes and escaping underground gases, it takes only one accident in the allowable 500-foot setback to severely damage a child's or elderly person's health and leave a permanent, stinking, oil-soaked stain on the earth. And there will inevitably be such accidents. That is the risk. And the reward will come by eliminating dangerous industrial activities in this artistic, sports, and vacation paradise.

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Property Rights and Property Wrongs

Fracking traffic is a big risk in a small town:


If you grew up in the 1950s the landscape was more empty and free. Though the population is stable or diminishing in rural areas, population distribution has changed significantly.  Land owners find they can subdivide property for people seeking a home in the countryside.  It is a win/win situation.  But now some of us find ourselves stuck in the 1950s. I once bought a wood lot in Maine and encountered all sorts of regulatory restrictions. The last straw was when I was told by a forester that timber harvesting is restricted because the land has a deer wintering area.
Fast forward to La Veta and Huerfano County. The land is no longer empty and free to do anything we like.  Our property rights may become property wrongs if our neighbor's health is threatened by the spill-over from activities on private land.  Take for instance the traffic situation in a small town like La Veta.  If the gas and oil frackfields in the shale underlying our fair valley were to be developed to their full potential, it could require tens of thousands of truckloads passing through the streets of La Veta.  We would all suffer from inconvenience and worst, the danger of 18 wheelers at all hours congesting Highway of Legends, Oak, and Main Streets. Those of my mindset or age have to consider the new circumstances. Fracking equals heavy trucking activity, but pray it not be on the streets of La Veta where residents, visitors, children, and many retired people enjoy the clean peaceful country setting on trips to and in town. In short, we can't have it both ways.  Welcome to 21st century reality.

Nothing in Fracking Benefits These Essentials.


We took a weekend trip north. Here are my observations:


Some here admire a northern county's gas and oil boom. They should take a closer look. Flat and with dirty skies, this particular county is no Huerfano County in terms of scenic wonders. Brown tanks and black burn-off stacks virtually line the highways there. It is just two years into a fracking boom and grass and crop lands are growing more and more barren due to service roads and well pads.  Will fly-by-night drilling companies post adequate bonds to heal the land in Huerfano County?  Who is minding the store? It is very understandable to collect a sign-on fee to lease your mineral rights, but seller's remorse may be settling in when you think about the damage to come. What to do? There is nothing in mineral leases protecting drillers when informed public opinion brings second thoughts. It is entirely reasonable, after looking at places where fracking has marred the landscape, to affirm that we have the right and the duty to protect our livestock, our water, our landscape, and our loved ones from a similar fate. With Shell leaving, there are already signs that the boom has become a bubble.  Boom, bubble, bust.  If Huerfano County were to be fracked to the limit, it would fuel the United States for around 20 days.  That isn't much of a trade-off. I get kind of a sick feeling when I think about Huerfano County looking like a  wasteland for the rest of my life. And remember, healthy livestock, like healthy people, require clean air, clean soil, healthy nutrition, and good water. Nothing in fracking benefits these essentials.

FOR Huerfano County

The Importance of Children's Health:

It is always surprising to learn of the depth of experience of some of our elected officials.  Art Bobian, who is chairman of the Huerfano Board of County Commissioners, is one example.  I have found that he: "...retired in 2002 from the American Cancer Society where he held a variety of positions including National Field Representative covering 15 states in the western part of the nation. He also held the position of Assistant Vice President for Internal Communications for the National Home Office in Atlanta, and finished his career as a Regional Vice President for Southern California.  Art has also served as President of La Plaza de Los Leones, an organization devoted to providing scholarships to Huerfano County students while promoting awareness of Hispanic contributions to the area."http://spcf.net/about-us.html.  Therefore  I want  to assemble copies of articles mentioning carcinogens that appear on the victims list website, http://pennsylvaniaallianceforcleanwaterandair.wordpress.com/the-list/, printed and in a folder for Art Bobian to read.

I also want to introduce an idea here that to gain maximum support in the county, we combine lease map information with household locations to form an alert to have present state of children's health documented in locations within 500 feet of potential drilling.

Our concerns have much in common with the Hispanic community and Catholic Church, and their children's health could be a crucial element in a campaign for fracking danger awareness in Huerfano County.

I think it is important  to be seen as strongly FOR Heurfano County, and for us to be respectful and caring in our attitude towards even those with whom we now disagree because they presently favor Shell's designs on our county.  Education of parents on fracking dangers is essential.


Thursday, August 22, 2013

BOOM YIKES! Exerpts From NPR

The following comments are from a discussion on National Public Radio.  The people that called in were from various areas of the United States, and their experience was pretty much similar as you will read here:

When you only have 6,000 people in that kind of space, and when you suddenly double and triple the population, it has a huge impact on absolutely everything: our schools, our medical clinics, our streets, our housing. And it was a very stressful time.  The infusion of cash doesn't come without complications. Outsiders double or triple the population. Service industries include prostitution and drugs. The air and water can suffer. And then what happens when the wells run dry? There's a tremendous amount of usually men coming to the community from different parts of the country, you're not sure you want your daughters walking all over town at any time.  We were paying our teachers very, very high salaries.  The downside was those teachers were really earning absolutely every extra penny they were earning because the classroom setting was perpetually changing. Every week there were new kids coming in, other kids leaving out. The growth was exponential, the traffic was frightening.  Along with the boom, came a lot of environmental damage.  That was probably the hardest for us locals to accept. There is the immediate doubling of the population that was scary enough to deal with, but you could try to at least handle that. But when it really got scary for many of us is when our air quality became very, very poor. In fact we had ozone levels that matched really the poorest of inner city like Los Angeles. And it was very dangerous. And we didn't quite know how to handle it. Do you not let your kids go to ski practice because breathing in this air is very bad when we live in these pristine mountains?  We're in the most pristine environmental part of the world, and yet we were horrendously impacted in the environment because of all this drilling.  The roads are terrible. The chances of accidents are very high. The hospitals are overburdened with accidents between 18-wheelers and passenger cars. So there's a - it's a mixed bag, but basically you can make good money there driving.  The degradation that I saw, there was a 13-to-one ratio of men to women with the man camps that came in.  There was a huge - we called it big brown cloud that just, as I think was mentioned, the pollution that just never went away. The intrinsic beauty of the place was to me being raped and pillaged. Every day I watched an oil rig, another one, go up in the mesa and the roads and the trucks. And it was endless and ceaseless. It never stopped.  It was all for, I imagine, making money or the good of the country, but I who lived there did not feel that, and I left because it was not the place I knew it to be, and it would never return because once you take nature, once you tear it apart, you just can't get that back. It won't come back.  But that also became a huge burden for people like my husband and I, who have cattle ranches there, because we couldn't begin - we weren't getting any more for our cattle, and we couldn't begin to compete for wages with what the gas fields were paying. So we were very labor-starved. We couldn't begin to compete with the gas companies when it came to getting parts for our tractors, or if our trucks broke down, we couldn't afford - now the mechanic that used to be $50 an hour was now $200 an hour, and he was plenty busy with work out in the gas fields.  That is true in spades up in North Dakota. The schools, the hospitals and the police and ancillary service workers cannot compete in the wage market created by an oil field. So teachers are being recruited in there and being housed - the last time I was up there, there was discussion of the schools buying housing for their teachers so that they could actually live there.  Police come in there, they've been recruited from academies across the country, they get there, and they discover they can make a lot more in the oil field than they can driving in a cruiser, and they leave. And in the hospitals, the support workers who, you know, do all the scut work in a hospital, the hospitals can't compete. It's a really difficult situation in terms of wages.  I worked in Williston on a frack crew for the last - for nine months last year. I was - went out in the field every day. It was 110 hours per week, two weeks straight, one week off, lived in a man camp. Two weeks ago, we buried one of my co-workers, died out there in a frack accident.  You do have a lot of gun permits being issued up there, particularly to women. It's a little rough. The male versus female proportion is way out of balance, so it gets a little rough for women up there.  One of the things I wanted to mention is that there's a lag, there's a revenue collection lag between the beginning of production and when the revenue starts flowing, and that doesn't match the impact on these local small towns. They don't get any revenue for two, three years. And so the impact piles up and you're trying to catch up afterwards, and that's still happening in North Dakota, and there's no guarantee that that money that's coming into the state gets back into the local towns that are being impacted because the states really have to go hat in hand, I mean, the towns - I'm sorry, have to go hat in hand to with the states to get special grants to mitigate the damages to their roads and everything else. 

Allan Savory on Cows and Grasslands

Cows to the Rescue:

Spring 2013 I drove through a dust storm in Pueblo blowing in from the eastern plains.  In an instant it went from daylight to a darkness greater than night.  How do we heal a land laid barren by sod-busting, over-grazing, gas and oil pads, and dirt roads.  Allan Savory offers one solution:


So the failure of earlier attempts combined with his estimation that two-thirds of Earth is now desertifying inspired Savory to search for a new approach to protecting and restoring grasslands. And he found it by thinking naturally and looking backward, not forward.

It makes no sense that land that once supported untold millions of grazing animals on massive migrations should be destroyed by the overgrazing of fewer or comparable numbers of livestock in more recent years. And there were areas of the U.S. where cattle had been removed for decades, but the grasslands were still desertifying.

Allan Savory says the key to restoring grasslands is to manage livestock to mimic the role once played by vast migrating herds.  “Clearly we have never understood desertification,” he said. “What we had failed to understand was that these areas developed with huge numbers of grazing animals [pursued by lots of huge carnivores]. Movement kept them from overgrazing.” This way of the past could also hold the key to the future. “The only option left,” according to Savory, is “to use livestock on the move to mimic the ancient herds.” Keeping cattle more densely packed on smaller plots of land and moving them frequently keeps them from exhausting the supply of living plants, turns scattered droppings into a full blanket of high-quality fertilizer, and keeps the repeated trod of untold tons from packing down the dirt. He’s done it for decades, and the results  are impressive.

“Holistic grazing” keeps more plants alive, adds nutrients to the soil, and creates soil conditions that hold and use water instead of letting it evaporate or run off. It is now practiced by thousands on five continents, and is the focus of the work of the Africa Centre for Holistic Management in Zimbabwe, as well as the Savory Institute in Boulder, Colorado.

Allan Savory pointed out a critical part of this story beyond preserving complex grassland ecosystems to sustain livestock, agriculture, and wildlife. The amount of plant life lost through desertification over decades has severely compromised Earth’s ability to take carbon dioxide out of the air. Just as we have increased the amount we’re putting into the atmosphere, we’re reducing the amount we take out.

There is a remarkable upside to this however. With all of the difficulties of maintaining a productive economy while reducing our carbon output, and mitigating the effects of a warming climate, if we can implement holistic grazing on half of the Earth’s grasslands, according to Allan, “we can take us back to pre-industrial [CO2] levels… and feed people.”

It would be wrong to think of changing the way we herd cattle as a silver bullet that will solve all of Earth and humanity’s challenges, but as a key step in promoting the kind of long-term, holistic view that Allan Savory has taken, it could go a long way towards repairing the land and our relationship to it.

Thanks to Winston Churchill

This is just a little fun using Winston Churchill's rallying speech in the Battle of Briton in World War II to rally the anti-fracking movement:

Even though large tracts of the wild and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of fracking and all the odious apparatus of gas and oil rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in Huerfano County, we shall fight on the plains and mountains, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the press, we shall defend our county, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the highways, we shall fight on the drilling grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.

Fracking and Good Highways Don't Mix

I wrote this letter to the editor to point out some discrepancies in logic in a previous week's newspaper:

In the Huerfano World Journal, January 24 2013, page 4: A government lobbyist is quoted as saying: "Improving the economy of southern Colorado can only happen with a sustainable water supply, good highways, and the right to extract natural resources we are blessed to have."  This off the cuff remark is disturbing in the light of certain realities.  Energy extraction, when forced and accelerated, requires within the life span of a well up to 400 road-damaging truckloads of supplies and water.  In addition the well site becomes a small refinery, removing chemicals that are unsuitable to go into a pipeline.  Some mineral rights lease granters may hit the jackpot, but many more families will end up with a polluting industrial environment way too close for comfort, and filling night time with annoying lights and sounds carrying for miles. Typically a gas field can grow to thousands of wells.  Now imagine the disillusion for tourists, artists, home buyers, and vacationers who come to experience the beauty of the landscape stretching from Huerfano Park to the Spanish Peaks and Cuchara. Is this the future we want in Huerfano? We have all heard the wise counsel, "with rights come responsibilities", and we must be responsible to see that sustainable water supply, good highways, and clean air are not destroyed by the right to extract.

Rolling Stone Article on Chesapeake

This article in The Rolling Stone gives great insight on the fracking boom:


By Jeff Goodell
March 1, 2012 8:00 AM ET

Aubrey McClendon, America's second-largest producer of natural gas, has never been afraid of a fight. He has become a billionaire by directing his company, Chesapeake Energy, to blast apart gas-soaked rocks a mile underground and pump the fuel to the surface. "We're the biggest frackers in the world," he declares proudly over a $400 bottle of French Bordeaux at a restaurant he co-owns in his hometown of Oklahoma City. "We frack all the time. What's the big deal?"

McClendon dominates America's supply of natural gas the same way the Tea Party-financing Koch brothers control the nation's pipelines and refineries. Like them, McClendon is an influential right-wing power broker – he helped fund the Swift Boat attacks against John Kerry in 2004, donated $250,000 to the presidential campaign of Rick Perry, and contributed more than $500,000 to stop gay marriage. But unlike his fellow energy czars, McClendon knows how to tone down his politics and present a friendlier, less ideological face to the public. He secretly gave $26 million to the Sierra Club to fight Big Coal, and built a Google-like campus for Chesapeake's 4,600 employees in Oklahoma City, complete with a 63,000-square-foot day care center, a luxurious gym and four cafes manned by cook-to-order chefs. He even voted for Barack Obama because he thought the country needed "an inspirational figure."

At 52, McClendon still looks like the whip-smart accountant he once aspired to be – crisp white shirt, polished shoes, a toss of white hair. To hear him tell it, the cleaner-than-coal fuel he produces will revive our faltering economy, free us from the tyranny of foreign oil and save the planet from global warming. "I have a fossil fuel that makes other fossil fuels obsolete," he boasts. By McClendon's estimate, the industry has drilled more than 1.2 million wells nationwide, yet so far there have been only a few confirmed cases where things have gone wrong – despite dire warnings from scientists and environmentalists that fracking pollutes rivers and streams, contaminates drinking water and turns large swaths of farmland into industrial moonscapes. "Where is the mushroom cloud?" McClendon asks. "Where are the dogs with one leg? Where are the people that have been maimed or hurt?"

He sips his Bordeaux; his own private wine cellar once boasted more than 10,000 bottles. It's a good riff, with some truth to it. But what McClendon leaves out is the real nature of the business he's in. Fracking, it turns out, is about producing cheap energy the same way the mortgage crisis was about helping realize the dreams of middle-class homeowners. For Chesapeake, the primary profit in fracking comes not from selling the gas itself, but from buying and flipping the land that contains the gas. The company is now the largest leaseholder in the United States, owning the drilling rights to some 15 million acres – an area more than twice the size of Maryland. McClendon has financed this land grab with junk bonds and complex partnerships and future production deals, creating a highly leveraged, deeply indebted company that has more in common with Enron than ExxonMobil. As McClendon put it in a conference call with Wall Street analysts a few years ago, "I can assure you that buying leases for x and selling them for 5x or 10x is a lot more profitable than trying to produce gas at $5 or $6 per million cubic feet."

According to Arthur Berman, a respected energy consultant in Texas who has spent years studying the industry, Chesapeake and its lesser competitors resemble a Ponzi scheme, overhyping the promise of shale gas in an effort to recoup their huge investments in leases and drilling. When the wells don't pay off, the firms wind up scrambling to mask their financial troubles with convoluted off-book accounting methods. "This is an industry that is caught in the grip of magical thinking," Berman says. "In fact, when you look at the level of debt some of these companies are carrying, and the questionable value of their gas reserves, there is a lot in common with the subprime mortgage market just before it melted down." Like generations of energy kingpins before him, it would seem, McClendon's primary goal is not to solve America's energy problems, but to build a pipeline directly from your wallet into his.

As recently as a decade ago, many energy experts believed that America was nearly pumped out – that the only oil and gas left here at home was too difficult and too expensive to get out of the ground. Until we can ferment synthetic fuels with genetically engineered yeast or develop solar cells as cheap as Frisbees, the argument went, we would be stuck buying oil from the Arabs.

Geologists had long known there was a lot more energy buried deep underground – they called these subterranean rock layers "the kitchen," because it was where the gas and oil were actually made, before they bubbled up and gathered in reservoirs. But nobody knew how to extract these deep reserves – at least, not in a way that made economic sense. Then, in the 1980s, a Texas wildcatter named George Mitchell began working on a way to drill a mile down into the earth, turn the drill sideways, and keep drilling horizontally into a thin layer of shale. Next, he pumped in a few million gallons of water and sand under enough pressure to shatter the rock. When he pumped the water out, gas and oil flowed out of the rock's fractured pores.

The new technique ignited a boom in drilling for "unconventional" sources of gas and oil: Shale gas now provides 25 percent of America's gas supply, enabling the U.S. to pass Russia as the world's largest producer of natural gas. Initially, even environmentalists were enthusiastic. Fred Krupp, who heads the Environmental Defense Fund, called the gas boom a "potential game changer" – a cleaner energy source that could replace coal and oil for a few decades, until the cost of wind and solar power dropped enough to put fossil fuels out of business. But exactly how much gas and oil we can continue to squeeze out of deep sources like shale rock is unclear. In his State of the Union address, President Obama estimated that there's enough to fuel the country for nearly 100 years. T. Boone Pickens, the energy billionaire who has a major stake in Chesapeake Energy, offers an even more sweeping assessment. "Natural gas," he tells me point-blank, "is the solution to America's energy problems."

At first, when oil and gas producers confined themselves to fracking in the wide-open spaces of Texas and Oklahoma, nobody much gave a damn. The trouble started in 2007, when drilling operators made a run on the Marcellus Shale, a broad region of gas reserves that stretches through Pennsylvania and up into Ohio and New York. Almost overnight, fracking's technological miracle was recast as the next great environmental menace. The Oscar-nominated film Gasland exposed the dark underbelly of fracking, interviewing residents who could literally light their faucets on fire, thanks to the gas that had contaminated their drinking water. Last year, The New York Times documented how gas drillers were dumping millions of gallons of irradiated wastewater loaded with toxic chemicals into Pennsylvania's rivers and streams, largely without regulatory oversight.

At the same time, scientists began to conclude that America's reserves of natural gas have been overhyped. In January, the Energy Department cut its estimate of the amount of gas available in the Marcellus Shale by nearly 70 percent, and a group affiliated with the Colorado School of Mines warns that there may be only 23 years' worth of economically recoverable gas left nationwide. Even worse, new studies suggest that because of fugitive emissions of methane from wellheads and pipelines, natural gas may actually be no better than coal when it comes to global warming. "I was an early optimist about natural gas," says Robert Kennedy Jr., who sits on a panel that's advising Gov. Andrew Cuomo on whether to allow drillers like McClendon to expand into New York. "But after looking into it, I now believe that, without tighter regulations and stricter oversight, the shale-gas boom could turn out to be an economic and environmental disaster."

The oil and gas business is full of guys like T. Boone Pickens, self-made men who rose from a hardscrabble life on the prairie to become titans of the industry. McClendon, by contrast, grew up awash in oil money: He's the great-nephew of Robert S. Kerr, the influential Oklahoma governor and senator who co-founded the Kerr-McGee Corp. in 1929. Kerr-McGee was the ExxonMobil of its time, an energy giant that eventually sold for $16 billion. McClendon's personal fortune is now estimated at $1.2 billion, including a major stake in the NBA's Oklahoma City Thunder and a $20 million retreat in Bermuda.

By the time McClendon headed off to college, at Duke University, he didn't have much interest in the family business. He majored in history, joined a frat and listened to a lot of Bruce Springsteen. But his real passion was accounting. "I just wanted to be a businessman," he says, "and to me, the best way to understand business was to be an accountant." He might have gone on to a steady, solid career at Arthur Andersen had he not come across an article in The Wall Street Journal during his senior year. "It was about two guys who had drilled a big well in the Anadarko Basin that had blown out, and it was alleged to be the biggest blowout in the history of the country," McClendon recalls. "They sold their stake to Washington Gas and Light and got a $100 million check. I thought, 'These are two dudes who just drilled a well and it happened to hit.' So that really piqued my interest."

After graduation, McClendon married his college sweetheart and went to work for a small Oklahoma City oil company owned by his uncle. He worked in accounting for a few months, but quickly became what is known in the industry as a "landman" – the person who finds and negotiates the leases that allow drillers to extract oil and gas. "Landmen were always the stepchild of the industry," he says. "Geologists and engineers were the important guys – but it dawned on me pretty early that all their fancy ideas aren't worth very much if we don't have a lease. If you've got the lease and I don't, you win."

In 1982, McClendon struck out on his own as a landman. He was 23, living in a modest house, making $24,000 a year. "I bought a typewriter, rented an office, bought some maps and basically just started to follow around other companies, trying to see what crumbs they would leave," he says. He called his tiny outfit Chesapeake Investments – for no reason except that "I always loved that region of the country." He soon forged a partnership with another landman, Tom Ward. "We worked together for six years," Ward recalls, "doing deals for scraps of land in Oklahoma, faxing each other in the middle of the night. Eventually, we got the hang of it."

When the fracking revolution began, McClendon says, he and Ward quickly realized that the new technique offered them an opening. In the natural gas industry, the advantage had long gone to operators with the geological and engineering expertise to pinpoint gas reservoirs. Now it didn't matter where you drilled – the gas was pretty much evenly distributed throughout the earth's deep shale layers. The edge suddenly belonged to operators who could lock up as much land as quickly and as cheaply as possible – precisely the skill that Ward and McClendon had developed scraping around Oklahoma land deeds. In 1989, the two men chipped in $50,000 to form a new company, Chesapeake Energy, to focus primarily on shale gas. It grew like a Silicon Valley startup: By 1993, when Chesapeake went public, the firm was valued at $25 million.

From the outset, financial risk-taking was as much a part of the firm's success as technological innovation. Chesapeake was the first gas-exploration company to issue high-yield junk bonds, which gave it a steady cash flow to pay for leasing and drilling. "To be able to borrow money for 10 years and ride out boom-and-bust cycles was almost as important an insight as horizontal drilling," McClendon says. "For the first time, we were able to build a company where, if something didn't work for a little bit of time, we could regroup and find something that did work."

By 2003, Chesapeake had expanded deeper into Oklahoma and Texas, as well as Louisiana and Arkansas. "They became a land-acquisition machine," says Phil Weiss, an analyst at Argus Research who has followed the firm for more than a decade. The key to success was discovering new gas plays before other companies, then leasing vast tracts of land as quickly and quietly as possible.

Chesapeake's land operation became almost as technologically sophisticated as its drilling operation, with a huge databank of property records and mineral-ownership rights across the country. "The goal is not just to pump gas," explains Pickens. "It's also to lock up future reserves." The company's financial statements estimate that it currently holds drilling rights to as much as 100 trillion cubic feet of gas – enough to supply the entire country for five years.

At Chesapeake, McClendon operated more like a land speculator than an oilman. "Our approach is to go in early, quietly and big," says Henry Hood, who directs Chesapeake's land purchases. "We like to get our deals signed before anybody knows what we're up to and tries to run up prices." But buying up such huge swaths of land requires huge chunks of cash – and the money often comes not from gas production, but from selling off land or going into debt. After Chesapeake drills a few wells in a region and "proves up" the reserves, it hawks the leases to big oil and gas companies looking to get into the shale-gas game. In 2010, it pocketed $2.2 billion by selling land it bought in Texas for $2,000 an acre to one of China's largest oil companies for $11,000 an acre. "That's a five-to-one return on investment," says Jeff Mobley, Chesapeake's senior vice president for investor relations.

In recent years, the company has also sold off the future proceeds it expects to receive from thousands of wells – a complex financing deal that enables it to borrow cash now without counting the debt it will owe when it has to drill the wells later. The very first deal, made with Deutsche Bank and a Swiss investment firm, brought Chesapeake more than $1 billion in return for 15 years of future production from 4,000 wells. "It's not illegal, but most gas and oil companies don't do it," says Bob Brackett, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. "Chesapeake's poor credit rating pushes them to turn to unconventional financing."

To make its operations even riskier, leaseholders like Chesapeake are required by law to drill on the land within three to five years after acquiring the rights or wind up forfeiting the lease. "The more land they acquire, the more capital they have to spend upfront," says Deborah Rogers, a former investment banker who learned just how precarious Chesapeake's business model was when she looked into the firm's financial statements after the company sunk wells near her property in Texas. "Then they have to drill it or lose it, which further adds to capital costs. And the more they drill, the more gas they produce, which lowers the price of gas and further reduces their revenues. In the end, this drilling treadmill is difficult to sustain for long – especially if the wells under­perform, or the resource turns out to not be as valuable as they thought."

This sort of gambling suits McClendon, who is known for placing big bets – and sometimes losing big. During the financial meltdown in 2008, McClendon was forced to sell off 94 percent of his stock in Chesapeake – some 33 million shares – for $550 million to meet a margin call on his personal investments. (Only a few months earlier, the stock had been worth $2 billion.) Despite the dramatic setback, Chesapeake's board boosted McClendon's annual salary to $112 million, making him the highest paid CEO at any S&P 500 company at the time. The pay hike, which sparked a shareholder lawsuit, was scorned by Wall Street analysts. "McClendon clearly thinks of Chesapeake as his own personal piggy bank," says one. In the end, that piggy bank may prove to be empty: In February, Chesapeake announced that, because of low gas prices, its revenues will fall $3.5 billion short of its expenses this year.

Until a few years ago, Bradford County was a forgotten landscape of struggling dairy farms and strip-mall nail salons dotting the Susquehanna River in northeastern Pennsylvania. Then, in 2007, gas speculators looking for the next big play zeroed in on the geologic formation called the Marcellus Shale, a 300-foot-thick layer of gas-soaked rock that underlies much of Pennsylvania, as well as parts of Ohio and New York. Chesapeake was one of the first operators to rush into the region, buying up nearly two million acres of land in just a few months. Since then, the company has drilled more than 600 wells here, and it hopes to drill thousands more, virtually covering the region with rigs. "In 10 years," McClendon says, "the Marcellus is likely to become the most productive natural gas field in the world." The county, population 62,000, has already been transformed from sleepy farmland to industrial boomtown: the roads crowded with trucks hauling water, the rail lines rumbling with trains hauling sand, the roadside bars overflowing with drill hands from Oklahoma and Texas, the hotels and motels booked for months in advance.

Chesapeake's operations in the region are run out of an old department store in the county seat of Towanda, located on the banks of the Susquehanna some 20 miles south of the New York state border. It feels more like a military outpost than a corporate office, with dozens of white SUVs emblazoned with the Chesapeake logo parked in rows out front. Inside, offices are separated by thin walls thrown up in a hurry, many of them decorated with arty shots of drilling rigs in pristine landscapes. In these parts, the company's PR efforts are squarely aimed at quelling any environmental fears. To underscore how safe fracking is, Brian Grove, Chesapeake's director of corporate development in the Marcellus region, explains that the layer of shale being drilled is 7,000 feet beneath the surface, whereas drinking water rarely runs deeper than 1,000 feet. "That leaves 6,000 feet of rock in ­between," he says. "There is no way that any fluids are going to migrate from the shale rock up to the drinking-water aquifers."

After graduation, McClendon married his college sweetheart and went to work for a small Oklahoma City oil company owned by his uncle. He worked in accounting for a few months, but quickly became what is known in the industry as a "landman" – the person who finds and negotiates the leases that allow drillers to extract oil and gas. "Landmen were always the stepchild of the industry," he says. "Geologists and engineers were the important guys – but it dawned on me pretty early that all their fancy ideas aren't worth very much if we don't have a lease. If you've got the lease and I don't, you win."

In 1982, McClendon struck out on his own as a landman. He was 23, living in a modest house, making $24,000 a year. "I bought a typewriter, rented an office, bought some maps and basically just started to follow around other companies, trying to see what crumbs they would leave," he says. He called his tiny outfit Chesapeake Investments – for no reason except that "I always loved that region of the country." He soon forged a partnership with another landman, Tom Ward. "We worked together for six years," Ward recalls, "doing deals for scraps of land in Oklahoma, faxing each other in the middle of the night. Eventually, we got the hang of it."

When the fracking revolution began, McClendon says, he and Ward quickly realized that the new technique offered them an opening. In the natural gas industry, the advantage had long gone to operators with the geological and engineering expertise to pinpoint gas reservoirs. Now it didn't matter where you drilled – the gas was pretty much evenly distributed throughout the earth's deep shale layers. The edge suddenly belonged to operators who could lock up as much land as quickly and as cheaply as possible – precisely the skill that Ward and McClendon had developed scraping around Oklahoma land deeds. In 1989, the two men chipped in $50,000 to form a new company, Chesapeake Energy, to focus primarily on shale gas. It grew like a Silicon Valley startup: By 1993, when Chesapeake went public, the firm was valued at $25 million.

From the outset, financial risk-taking was as much a part of the firm's success as technological innovation. Chesapeake was the first gas-exploration company to issue high-yield junk bonds, which gave it a steady cash flow to pay for leasing and drilling. "To be able to borrow money for 10 years and ride out boom-and-bust cycles was almost as important an insight as horizontal drilling," McClendon says. "For the first time, we were able to build a company where, if something didn't work for a little bit of time, we could regroup and find something that did work."

By 2003, Chesapeake had expanded deeper into Oklahoma and Texas, as well as Louisiana and Arkansas. "They became a land-acquisition machine," says Phil Weiss, an analyst at Argus Research who has followed the firm for more than a decade. The key to success was discovering new gas plays before other companies, then leasing vast tracts of land as quickly and quietly as possible.

Chesapeake's land operation became almost as technologically sophisticated as its drilling operation, with a huge databank of property records and mineral-ownership rights across the country. "The goal is not just to pump gas," explains Pickens. "It's also to lock up future reserves." The company's financial statements estimate that it currently holds drilling rights to as much as 100 trillion cubic feet of gas – enough to supply the entire country for five years.

At Chesapeake, McClendon operated more like a land speculator than an oilman. "Our approach is to go in early, quietly and big," says Henry Hood, who directs Chesapeake's land purchases. "We like to get our deals signed before anybody knows what we're up to and tries to run up prices." But buying up such huge swaths of land requires huge chunks of cash – and the money often comes not from gas production, but from selling off land or going into debt. After Chesapeake drills a few wells in a region and "proves up" the reserves, it hawks the leases to big oil and gas companies looking to get into the shale-gas game. In 2010, it pocketed $2.2 billion by selling land it bought in Texas for $2,000 an acre to one of China's largest oil companies for $11,000 an acre. "That's a five-to-one return on investment," says Jeff Mobley, Chesapeake's senior vice president for investor relations.

In recent years, the company has also sold off the future proceeds it expects to receive from thousands of wells – a complex financing deal that enables it to borrow cash now without counting the debt it will owe when it has to drill the wells later. The very first deal, made with Deutsche Bank and a Swiss investment firm, brought Chesapeake more than $1 billion in return for 15 years of future production from 4,000 wells. "It's not illegal, but most gas and oil companies don't do it," says Bob Brackett, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. "Chesapeake's poor credit rating pushes them to turn to unconventional financing."

To make its operations even riskier, leaseholders like Chesapeake are required by law to drill on the land within three to five years after acquiring the rights or wind up forfeiting the lease. "The more land they acquire, the more capital they have to spend upfront," says Deborah Rogers, a former investment banker who learned just how precarious Chesapeake's business model was when she looked into the firm's financial statements after the company sunk wells near her property in Texas. "Then they have to drill it or lose it, which further adds to capital costs. And the more they drill, the more gas they produce, which lowers the price of gas and further reduces their revenues. In the end, this drilling treadmill is difficult to sustain for long – especially if the wells under­perform, or the resource turns out to not be as valuable as they thought."

This sort of gambling suits McClendon, who is known for placing big bets – and sometimes losing big. During the financial meltdown in 2008, McClendon was forced to sell off 94 percent of his stock in Chesapeake – some 33 million shares – for $550 million to meet a margin call on his personal investments. (Only a few months earlier, the stock had been worth $2 billion.) Despite the dramatic setback, Chesapeake's board boosted McClendon's annual salary to $112 million, making him the highest paid CEO at any S&P 500 company at the time. The pay hike, which sparked a shareholder lawsuit, was scorned by Wall Street analysts. "McClendon clearly thinks of Chesapeake as his own personal piggy bank," says one. In the end, that piggy bank may prove to be empty: In February, Chesapeake announced that, because of low gas prices, its revenues will fall $3.5 billion short of its expenses this year.

Until a few years ago, Bradford County was a forgotten landscape of struggling dairy farms and strip-mall nail salons dotting the Susquehanna River in northeastern Pennsylvania. Then, in 2007, gas speculators looking for the next big play zeroed in on the geologic formation called the Marcellus Shale, a 300-foot-thick layer of gas-soaked rock that underlies much of Pennsylvania, as well as parts of Ohio and New York. Chesapeake was one of the first operators to rush into the region, buying up nearly two million acres of land in just a few months. Since then, the company has drilled more than 600 wells here, and it hopes to drill thousands more, virtually covering the region with rigs. "In 10 years," McClendon says, "the Marcellus is likely to become the most productive natural gas field in the world." The county, population 62,000, has already been transformed from sleepy farmland to industrial boomtown: the roads crowded with trucks hauling water, the rail lines rumbling with trains hauling sand, the roadside bars overflowing with drill hands from Oklahoma and Texas, the hotels and motels booked for months in advance.

Chesapeake's operations in the region are run out of an old department store in the county seat of Towanda, located on the banks of the Susquehanna some 20 miles south of the New York state border. It feels more like a military outpost than a corporate office, with dozens of white SUVs emblazoned with the Chesapeake logo parked in rows out front. Inside, offices are separated by thin walls thrown up in a hurry, many of them decorated with arty shots of drilling rigs in pristine landscapes. In these parts, the company's PR efforts are squarely aimed at quelling any environmental fears. To underscore how safe fracking is, Brian Grove, Chesapeake's director of corporate development in the Marcellus region, explains that the layer of shale being drilled is 7,000 feet beneath the surface, whereas drinking water rarely runs deeper than 1,000 feet. "That leaves 6,000 feet of rock in ­between," he says. "There is no way that any fluids are going to migrate from the shale rock up to the drinking-water aquifers."

Drilling, which began the next year, was an immediate nightmare. One morning, Vargson woke up at 6 a.m. to find 18 trucks idling in her driveway. The hillside behind her house was leveled for a drill pad, and the rig went up 500 feet from her back door. Once the fracking began, water trucks made hundreds of trips up and down her driveway, while air compressors roared all day and night. When the gas was flared off before production began, the flame was so bright in the night sky that she could see it glowing red on the horizon 12 miles away.

Vargson noticed not long after production began in 2009 that water in the trough out back stopped freezing on cold nights. Inside the house, the faucet began to sputter and spit. Her husband seemed to have a lot of headaches, and Vargson felt nauseous if she stayed in the shower for more than a few minutes. Acting on a tip from a friend, she had her water tested. It was loaded with methane.

"I discovered I could light my water on fire," she says. "And I still can." To demonstrate, she walks over to the faucet in her kitchen, lights a match and turns on the faucet. Whoosh! A flame shoots out like a blowtorch.

Vargson stopped drinking the water after she discovered the methane – but tests showed that her water also contained elevated levels of toxic chemicals like radium, manganese and strontium. Chesapeake agreed to supply Vargson with fresh drinking water, delivered to her door in five-gallon jugs once a month, but it denies any responsibility for the elevated methane levels. Tom Darrah, a Duke geologist who has examined Vargson's well for a new study, finds that difficult to square with the facts. "Anyone who has seen the data I have and thinks this much methane in her well is from natural sources has their head in the sand," he says.

For Vargson, and many homeowners just like her, fracking has proved to be a full-blown disaster. Since she signed up with Chesapeake, her back pasture has become a full-time industrial zone, her water supply has been contaminated, and it will be virtually impossible to sell her home, since it lacks drinkable water. What's more, her well turned out to be a dud: The landman from Chesapeake who sold her on the deal failed to mention that 80 percent of a well's gas is often depleted within the first two years. In all likelihood, Vargson's well will end up being a money-loser for Chesapeake, either sold off to another company or refracked in an attempt to dislodge more gas. Either way, the royalty checks that Vargson and her husband were counting on for retirement will hardly pay for dinner and a movie. "We made about $1,400 the first month, and it's been all downhill from there," she says. Her check for last November: $70.

I ask her how she feels about the promise of fracking now. "I think the industry is destroying our water resource to extract a gas resource," she says. "And in the long run, I don't think that's a very smart trade."

As fracking has come under increasing attack, McClendon has used his financial clout to keep the drills pumping. Chesapeake spent only $2 million on federal lobbying last year – about average for a company its size – but it has contributed almost as much to political candidates and PACs in the current election cycle as the Koch brothers. (McClendon makes it clear that he won't be voting for Obama this time around.) In Pennsylvania, Chesapeake has contributed more than half a million dollars to state and local politicians since 2008 – the highest total in the industry.

McClendon, who funds an industry lobbying group called America's Natural Gas Alliance, has also used his cash to attack Big Coal, hoping to topple his chief competitor and refit coal plants to run on natural gas. In 2007, when a Texas utility threatened to build 11 new coal plants, he won over many clean-energy activists by spending $1 million on a "Coal Is Filthy" media blitz. The $26 million he gave to the Sierra Club helped fund its "Beyond Coal" campaign, which has blocked more than 150 new coal plants. But in 2010, when McClendon tried to cement an alliance with environmental groups at a two-day conference in Colorado, the plan backfired. McClendon struck many of the assembled activists as aloof and arrogant. A few weeks later, after he backed away from a promise to lobby for tougher laws requiring the industry to disclose the chemicals it uses in fracking fluid, one top environmentalist sent an e-mail to other participants calling McClendon "a pathological liar."

But McClendon's worst enemy may not be environmentalists or coal companies, but his own recklessness. He played a leading role in creating the fracking bubble by hyping the promise of endless natural gas and sweet-talking Wall Street into funding a massive land grab. If the bubble bursts, Chesapeake's stockholders won't be the only ones who pay the price – the shock waves will be felt throughout the economy, from homeowners who rely on natural gas for heat to manufacturers who were betting on it to power their new factories. Thanks to McClendon's gambles, Chesapeake is struggling to cover $10 billion in long-term debt. In recent weeks, the company has announced it will sell off more land and shut down some production. McClendon also hopes to increase demand and boost gas prices by promoting cars and power plants that run on natural gas, and by cutting deals to export gas to Europe and Asia, where prices are five times higher than in the U.S.

Turning vast stretches of Pennsylvania into a pincushion in order to ship gas to China doesn't exactly mesh with McClendon's emphasis on making America energy independent. But unless something changes, that's precisely where things are headed – on a grand scale. "In the Marcellus, the boom has just begun," says Ingraffea, the Cornell engineer. "The idea is to drill everywhere." Tougher laws and stricter enforcement could mitigate the damage to people and the environment, but widespread drilling – especially at the boomtown pace that McClendon is pushing – will inevitably result in mishaps. Well casings will fail. Fracking chemicals will be spilled. Drinking water will be contaminated. Methane will seep into the atmosphere, accelerating global warming. When you add it all up, you can see why many environmentalists and clean-energy activists no longer see natural gas as a bridge to a more sustainable future. "It's time to stop thinking of natural gas as a 'kinder, gentler' energy source," Mike Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, recently blogged. "Instead of rushing to see how quickly we can extract natural gas, we should be focusing on how to be sure we are using less."

That kind of talk enrages McClendon. "What does that mean, Mike?" he asks angrily when I ask him about Brune's comment over dinner at his restaurant. "Does that mean we maximize the use of coal? That we fill the countryside with windmills and kill all the migratory birds and double electricity prices while we do it? What's the human cost to doubling electricity prices? What's the human benefit to halving them? I think those are enormously important questions that are never imposed at the same time people say, 'Fracking is bad.'"

I look at the $400 bottle of wine on the table. Much of what McClendon says is misleading – wind power is as cheap as gas in some places and falling fast, and cutting back on gas doesn't have to mean burning more coal. But his plan is clear. He's not going to back off until every last square foot of shale rock in America is drilled and fracked and sucked clean of gas. McClendon may rely on sophisticated new drilling technologies, but at heart, he's driven by the same dream of endless extraction that has gripped oil barons and coal companies since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. In the end, all his talk of energy independence and a cleaner, brighter future boils down to a single demand, as simple as it is disastrous: Drill, baby, drill.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-big-fracking-bubble-the-scam-behind-the-gas-boom-20120301#ixzz2ONWQKggI
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

Oil Sands

A Deeper look at the XL pipeline and Oil Sands issue:


  The US State Department is key in allowing new pipelines to be built across Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas.  These pipelines can leak and boost petroleum supplies adding to global climate change.
   Tar sands derived crude oil is just another desperate attempt to prolong  destructive worldwide petroleum madness and addiction. What are the issues?
   The Canadian oil industry has an excess capacity beyond its ability to export.  They need the United States to allow a large capacity pipeline to sell the surpluses they, Canadian oil, are holding. The value of their oil is lower than world market prices simply because there is no way to transport it in the quantities needed.  One market example, the Chinese oil company Sinopec Oil Sands Partnership, owns 9.03% of the Syncrude Project. http://www.cdnoilsands.com/operations/syncrude-project-at-a-glance/default.aspx  Go to the Canadian Oil Sands website yourself and study the destructive impact: http://www.cdnoilsands.com/operations/ProductionProcess/default.aspx
    For every barrel of crude oil it takes two barrels of “imported” water.  That is, water that must be added to huge quantities of recycled water used in extracting oil from sand.    Canadian Oil Sands boasts on its website  that it has reclaimed 3,500 hectares (only 3% of total leased land).  Is this typical of oil and gas companies: pathetic land reclamation and water destruction?
   Let's get on track with Germany, and put solar panels on every rooftop. Stop wasting money cleaning up after the mess that petroleum fuel causes.  Spend that money to convert to solar.  And no, natural gas is not a bridge to anything except more destructive drilling, fracking, and water pollution.

Eating Our Young

Does it really have to come to this?  Are we going to destroy our national environment with our addiction to fossil fuel?


The West has been the national dumping ground for too long, and doesn't have ample rain and trees to cover it up.  Fossil fuels have powered the American way of life, but now we are starting to eat our young.  I mean by that, we are now destroying the special character of entire counties, we are removing mountain tops to get coal, we are pumping salty water onto our agricultural lands.  The good news is America has the best scientific minds on earth, and there are better ways to fuel progress than dangerous nuclear and fossil fuels.  Google "frack field" for some images of landscapes laid barren, and then on youtube, search “frac job” and see and hear the racket of huge pumps injecting millions of gallons of water.  If you lease mineral rights under your ranch land, next time consider leasing to a solar power or wind power company instead.  Clean wind and solar installations operate for decades, don't require constant heavy truck traffic, or mess up the water supply.  Thank-you, fossil fuel, for bringing America forward, but you are going too far with fracking the homeland. We don't want you eating our young.

BLM Lease of Scout Ranch Area


The Bureau of Land Management is "responsible" for facilitating mineral rights.  The following was submitted early on in a public comment process.  It was basically ignored and the leasing is going forward on East Spanish Peak, in spite of a recent catastrophic forest fire at the proposed lease, which makes the location even more fragile: 




We learned that the BLM is considering mineral leasing land on East Spanish peak. We can not imagine that anyone would seriously consider fracking for shale oil in such a location. However if there is shale oil beneath the Spanish Peaks, then the BLM should factor in the tremendous amount of truck traffic and high pressure, high powered pumps and compressors, huge volumes of water, fracking materials, and produced waste water and petroleum.  There would be fluid transmitting lines, valves, tanks, plus semi trailer trucks pounding up and down dusty county roads, past residences, in the midst of hikers, and Boy Scout Ranch campers.  By probability alone, there will be accidents, leaks, and human error. As far as the long term impacts, human error and accidents of a single oil spill or poisoned water storage breech would result in irreparable damage to the forest floor, elk calving habitat, and down slope camp and residential water supplies. The heavily timbered nature of the area was not placed there for screening of industrial activity, and to suggest that this is the case as stated in the initial BLM environmental assessment is astounding.  The leasing and development of parcel #6657 would alter the physical setting of the area and the quality of life during drilling operations, and long thereafter, given the inevitability of human error and accidents when working with machinery capable of shattering solid rock to squeeze out oil.

Not a Good Fit for Huerfano

An appeal to ban fracking in Huerfano County:


Why Shale oil and Shale Gas are not a good fit for Huerfano County.  First is water scarcity. Second is health of humans and livestock. Third is the threat to our strongest asset, beautiful countryside to attract tourists and home owners.  The deck is stacked in favor of the oil and gas industry and the regulators.  Why do we fight back?  Water use for fracking is very high.  Well pads and roads will cover the county and strip grassland cover.  This means less rain will fall and water will run off.  Polluted water, polluted air, and polluted scenery affect us all and the health of our animals.  All this will drive away people who come here because of its beauty.  How do we fight back?  We must reverse the power of corporations and regulators to make our decsions for us.  We have collected our lease sign up checks, but now we see that to go further will destroy our way of life in exchange for brown skies, traffic hazards, and depleted water.  This can be stopped.  As a County we simply have to say "No, not here."  All over the United States communities are standing up for their rights. Let's do it in Huerfano County.